Files
boc/docs/design/LANDVEX_INTELLIGENCE_LAB.md
T
Bernt 67ca05f2b2 docs: LandveX Intelligence Lab v1.3 — Government Quality Standards added
- Added comprehensive quality standards for public sector:
  - Code Quality: TypeScript/Rust strict, ≥80% test coverage, static analysis,
    mandatory code review, API documentation
  - Security: OAuth 2.0 + MFA, RBAC + audit, AES-256/TLS 1.3,
    HashiCorp Vault, weekly vulnerability scans
  - Audit & Compliance: Immutable signed logs, configurable retention,
    full export, WCAG 2.1 AA, Swedish + English
  - Infrastructure: GitOps, OpenTelemetry, 3-2-1 backup, RPO<1h RTO<4h,
    horizontal scaling
  - AI/ML: MLflow versioning, full data lineage, bias testing,
    SHAP/LIME explainability, model cards
  - Development: Git workflow, CI/CD, IaC, dependency management,
    incident response runbooks

Rationale: LandveX serves municipalities and government agencies.
Intelligence Lab must satisfy public sector procurement, audit,
and compliance requirements from day one.
2026-07-02 13:08:22 +00:00

14 KiB

LANDVEX INTELLIGENCE LAB

Internal Development Environment for Control Intelligence

Version 1.0
Status SPECIFICATION
Purpose Build, test, and verify LandveX Control Intelligence before production

Core Principles

LandveX Intelligence Lab does not produce AI models. It produces verified Control Intelligence.

This is an internal tool. Never a customer product.

All artifacts are immutable and versioned.

  • Raw images are never modified
  • Annotations are versioned
  • Models are versioned
  • Evaluation reports are versioned
  • Decision Cases are versioned
  • Replay results are saved as new artifacts

Every change must be traceable to a specific experiment, model version, dataset, and decision.

Quality Standards for Government & Public Sector

LandveX serves municipalities, government agencies, and public infrastructure owners. The Intelligence Lab must be built to standards that satisfy public sector procurement, audit, and compliance requirements.

Code Quality

Requirement Standard Rationale
Type Safety Strict TypeScript or Rust Eliminates entire classes of runtime errors
Test Coverage ≥80% unit, ≥90% critical paths Public sector demands verifiable quality
Static Analysis ESLint + SonarQube + Snyk Catch issues before deployment
Code Review All changes require 2 approvals No unreviewed code in production
Documentation Every public API documented Procurement requires documentation

Security

Requirement Standard Rationale
Authentication OAuth 2.0 + MFA Government security requirements
Authorization RBAC with audit logging Who did what, when
Encryption AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit Data protection regulations
Secrets Management HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager No secrets in code
Vulnerability Scanning Weekly automated scans Continuous security

Audit & Compliance

Requirement Standard Rationale
Immutable Audit Log Append-only, signed logs Tamper-evident history
Data Retention Configurable per jurisdiction GDPR, local laws
Export Capability Full data export in standard formats Freedom of information requests
Accessibility WCAG 2.1 AA Public sector requirement
Localization Swedish + English Government customers

Infrastructure

Requirement Standard Rationale
Deployment GitOps (ArgoCD/Flux) Reproducible, auditable deployments
Observability OpenTelemetry + structured logging Debug production issues
Backup 3-2-1 rule, tested restores Business continuity
Disaster Recovery RPO < 1h, RTO < 4h Critical infrastructure
Scalability Horizontal scaling, stateless services Handle peak loads

AI/ML Specific

Requirement Standard Rationale
Model Versioning MLflow or similar Track every model version
Data Lineage Full provenance for all datasets Explain model decisions
Bias Testing Automated fairness metrics Prevent discriminatory outcomes
Explainability SHAP or LIME for all predictions Right to explanation
Model Cards Documented for every model Transparency

Development Practices

Requirement Standard Rationale
Git Workflow Trunk-based or GitFlow Clear, auditable history
CI/CD Automated testing, staging, production No manual deployments
Infrastructure as Code Terraform or Pulumi Version-controlled infrastructure
Dependency Management Renovate or Dependabot Keep dependencies updated
Incident Response Documented runbooks Handle outages systematically

Product Architecture

quiXzoom
    ↓
Observations
    ↓
LandveX Intelligence Lab
    ↓
Improved Models
    ↓
LandveX
    ↓
Better Decisions
    ↓
Feedback
    ↓
Intelligence Lab

Two products:

  • quiXzoom — produces observations
  • LandveX — produces decisions
  • Intelligence Lab — the factory that improves both

Repository

landvex-intelligence-lab

Separate from:

  • quixzoom-app
  • landvex-web
  • aamos-core

Architecture

LandveX Intelligence Lab
│
┌─────────────────┼─────────────────┐
│                 │                 │
Developer UI    Training API    Experiment API
│                 │                 │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┘
│
Event Bus / Queue
│
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Storage Layer
Images │ Videos │ Missions │ Models │ Logs
S3/R2 Buckets + PostgreSQL + Neo4j
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
│
Processing Pipelines

Navigation

Dashboard
├── Models
├── Datasets
├── Annotations
├── Training
├── Evaluation
├── Decision Cases
├── Replay
├── Validation
├── Promote Model
└── Settings

Dashboard

Shows AI status, not business data.

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Datasets                            │
│ Healthy: 12                         │
│ Needs Review: 3                     │
│ Corrupted: 0                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Training Jobs                       │
│ Running: 2                          │
│ Queued: 1                           │
│ Completed: 47                       │
│ Failed: 0                           │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Decision Cases                      │
│ Validated: 23                       │
│ Pending: 5                          │
│ Rejected: 2                         │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Replay Jobs                         │
│ Ready: 8                            │
│ Running: 1                          │
│ Finished: 34                        │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘

Mission Replay

Click through the entire chain:

Video → Frame → Bounding boxes → Detected objects → Evidence → Finding → Decision → Business Impact

Annotation

┌─────────┬─────────────┬──────────────┐
│ Video   │ AI Suggestion│ Manual       │
│         │              │ Correction   │
├─────────┼─────────────┼──────────────┤
│         │ Object:      │ Correct?     │
│         │ Road Crack   │ YES / NO     │
│         │ Confidence:  │              │
│         │ 82%          │ Severity:    │
│         │              │ Low / Medium │
│         │              │ / High       │
└─────────┴─────────────┴──────────────┘

Decision Cases

The most important asset.

Not images. Not videos. Not AI models.

But:

Observation → Evidence → Finding → Decision → Outcome → Learning

After a few years, hundreds of thousands of verified Decision Cases. Not just a training dataset — a library of how real observations lead to real decisions and real outcomes.

Case #4232
├── Reality
├── Observation
├── Evidence
├── Finding
├── Decision
├── Outcome
└── Learning

All cases playable.


Benchmark

Compare models:

Model Precision Recall F1 Latency Decision Accuracy
YOLO v8 0.89 0.87 0.88 45ms
Grounding DINO 0.91 0.85 0.88 120ms
SAM 0.88 0.90 0.89 200ms
Custom 0.92 0.91 0.915 60ms 0.87

Replay

Find regressions:

Mission 213
├── Play
├── Show AI
├── Show Human Annotation
├── Differences
├── New Model
└── Old Model

Validation

Field Trials
Scenario Tests
Decision Tests
Evidence Tests
Golden Failures
Regression Tests

Promote Model (Not Deploy)

Development → Validation → Pilot → Production

Not "Deploy". "Promote Model".


Experiments

Experiments
├── EP-1.0
├── DS-001
├── DS-002
├── DS-003
├── Field Trials
└── Metrics

Link experiment protocol to real development and validation data.


Processing Pipelines

1. Ingestion Pipeline

Input: Images, video, GPS, EXIF, metadata Checks: Checksums, versioning Output: Raw Dataset

2. Dataset Pipeline

Input: Raw Dataset Checks: Sort, deduplicate, quality control, resolution, blur detection, GPS validation Output: Validated Dataset

3. Annotation Pipeline

Input: Validated Dataset Process: AI suggestions, manual correction, label versions, consensus Output: Verified Dataset

4. Training Pipeline

Input: Verified Dataset Process: Start training, hyperparameters, checkpoints, GPU jobs Output: Model Artifact

5. Evaluation Pipeline

Input: Model Artifact Metrics: Precision, recall, F1, decision accuracy, regression Output: Evaluation Report

6. Replay Pipeline

Input: Old missions, Model v14, Model v15 Process: Run both models, compare differences Output: Regression Report

7. Decision Validation Pipeline

Input: Observation Process: Full chain — Observation → Evidence → Finding → Decision → Business Impact Output: Decision Validation Report


Bucket Structure

raw-images/
raw-video/
missions/
datasets/
annotations/
training/
models/
replays/
evaluation/
decision-cases/
field-trials/
exports/
archives/

All content is versioned:

model-v14/
model-v15/
model-v16/

AI Job Queue

All jobs are asynchronous:

Upload → Queue → Worker → GPU → Storage → Notification

Not synchronous API calls.


What This Tool Collects

  • Model training
  • Annotation
  • Datasets
  • Replay
  • Decision chains
  • Validation
  • Regression tests
  • Experiments
  • Model promotion

New Developer Experience

A new AI engineer should open the repo and within minutes understand:

"This is the tool where we build, test, and verify LandveX Control Intelligence before anything reaches production."


Relationship to Principles

  • All development in Git
  • All experiments reproducible
  • All models traceable from training to validation to production
  • Version control and traceability

MVP Milestone: "First Verified Decision"

Definition: A developer can:

  1. Film a real object with quiXzoom
  2. Import material to Intelligence Lab
  3. Review and correct AI interpretation
  4. Create a Decision Case
  5. Follow the entire chain from observation to decision with full traceability

When this works, you have the first complete, verifiable Control Intelligence pipeline.

Development Phases

Phase 1 — Essential (for pilot missions)

Feature Purpose
Ingestion Upload images/video, show metadata (GPS, time, device), store raw data immutably
Dataset Explorer Browse missions, filter, search, open a mission
Annotation AI suggestions, manual correction, version history
Decision Case Viewer Observation → Evidence → Finding → Decision → Business Impact → Learning

This is the heart.

Phase 2 — Scale (when running many missions)

Feature Purpose
Replay Compare model versions on same mission
Benchmark Model comparisons
Evaluation Regression tests

Phase 3 — Advanced (when having multiple models)

Feature Purpose
GPU Jobs Training queue
Hyperparameter Runs Automated experiments
Model Promotion Development → Validation → Pilot → Production
Canary Releases Gradual rollout

New Areas

Data Quality

Before training anything:

Images
├── Healthy
├── Blurred
├── Duplicate
├── Wrong GPS
├── Night
├── Rain
└── Occluded

Coverage:

Roads, Buildings, Signs, Drainage, Vegetation

Quickly shows why a model performs well or poorly.

Decision Analytics

Not AI metrics. Decision metrics.

Metric Question
Acceptance Rate How many recommendations were accepted?
Ignore Rate How many were ignored?
Accuracy How many proved correct?
Insufficient Evidence How many lacked enough evidence?
Data Collection Value How often did "Collect more data" lead to a better decision?

Closer to LandveX business value than traditional AI metrics.


ändringshistoria

Version Datum Beskrivning
1.0 2026-07-02 Initial specification for LandveX Intelligence Lab
1.1 2026-07-02 Added architecture, pipelines, immutability
1.2 2026-07-02 Added MVP milestone, development phases, Data Quality, Decision Analytics
1.3 2026-07-02 Added Government Quality Standards for public sector compliance

STATUS

SPECIFICATION — Awaiting development decision

Next decision: Begin MVP implementation (Phase 1: Ingestion, Dataset Explorer, Annotation, Decision Case Viewer) or wait for further input.