Bernt
edf1e6e0d6
- FOUNDATIONS-v1.0.md updated:
- Added Landvex Core Principle and Design Constitution to frozen foundations
- Added Core Principle Rules to invariants (2.4)
- Reordered component priority: Modal, Search, Map Panel, Navigation, Table, Data Grid
- Reflects business value: search and maps are central to Landvex
- EXPERIENCE_AUDIT.md (v1.0, LOCKED):
- Four questions for every screen:
1. Can purpose be understood in 3 seconds?
2. Is 'Reality → Decision' visible?
3. Is it obvious what the user should do?
4. Does everything contribute to the decision?
- Three-second rule levels with verification method
- Audit process: select screens → apply questions → prioritize fixes → verify
- Example audit format
- Core Principle Check for RFCs: 4 questions before approval
- COMPONENT_TEMPLATE.md updated:
- Added Core Principle section to template
- Requires: decision support, cognitive load reduction, 3-second understanding
- RFC_DEFINITION_OF_DONE.md updated:
- Added Core Principle as criterion #2 (was 12 criteria, now 13)
- Exit criteria: must pass all 13
Rationale: Freeze foundation with Core Principle as highest authority.
Experience audit ensures all screens support decision-making.
Core Principle Check prevents components that don't serve the user.
Business-value prioritization: search and maps before tables.
2.2 KiB
2.2 KiB
RFC DEFINITION OF DONE
Quality Gate for Every RFC Component
| Version | 1.0 |
| Status | LOCKED |
| Scope | All Tier 1, 2, 3 components |
Checklist
| # | Criterion | Requirement | Verified By |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RFC Structure | 100% complete per COMPONENT_TEMPLATE.md |
Self-check + Review |
| 2 | Core Principle | Supports "From Reality → Decision" | Self-check + Review |
| 3 | Cognitive Purpose | Documented — what problem does this solve? | Self-check + Review |
| 4 | User Expectation | Documented — what does the user expect? | Self-check + Review |
| 5 | Interaction Contract | Documented — events, responses, state machine | Self-check + Review |
| 6 | Failure Behaviour | Documented — every failure mode handled | Self-check + Review |
| 7 | Accessibility Contract | Documented — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance | Self-check + Review |
| 8 | AI Contract | Documented — when AI chooses this component | Self-check + Review |
| 9 | Token Dependencies | All tokens listed, no hardcoded values | Automated lint |
| 10 | Motion | Follows Motion System v1, reduced motion included | Self-check + Review |
| 11 | Anti-Patterns | Relevant anti-patterns listed and avoided | Self-check + Review |
| 12 | Compliance Matrix | Updated in same PR | Self-check |
| 13 | Reference Example | Working implementation or Storybook story | Implementation |
Sign-Off
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Author | Self-check all criteria before requesting review |
| Reviewer | Verify criteria 1–7, 9–10 |
| Automated | Verify criteria 8 (lint) |
| QA | Verify criterion 12 |
Exit Criteria
MUST pass all 13 criteria before component is marked "Complete" in Compliance Matrix.
MAY merge with criteria 13 pending if implementation is in separate PR.
ÄNDRINGSHISTORIA
| Version | Datum | Beskrivning |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2026-07-02 | Initial Definition of Done for RFC components |
STATUS
LOCKED
- Mindre revideringar: 1.x-serien
- Brytande ändringar: Kräver Architecture Review, ny major-version (2.0+)