# EXPERIENCE AUDIT

**Checklist for Evaluating Screens Against Landvex Core Principle**

| | |
|---|---|
| **Version** | 1.0 |
| **Status** | LOCKED |
| **Scope** | All Landvex & quiXzoom screens, documentation, presentations |

---

## The Four Questions

For every screen, view, or presentation, ask:

### 1. Can the purpose be understood in 3 seconds?

**Check:**
- [ ] Is the primary action or information immediately visible?
- [ ] Is there visual hierarchy that guides the eye?
- [ ] Are there no competing elements for attention?

**Pass criteria:** A new user can answer "What does this screen do?" within 3 seconds.

### 2. Is "Reality → Decision" visible?

**Check:**
- [ ] Does the screen show where reality becomes data?
- [ ] Is the decision basis clearly presented?
- [ ] Is the connection between input and output obvious?

**Pass criteria:** The user sees the flow from reality to decision without explanation.

### 3. Is it obvious what the user should do?

**Check:**
- [ ] Is the primary action clearly indicated?
- [ ] Are secondary actions distinguishable from primary?
- [ ] Is there no ambiguity about next steps?

**Pass criteria:** The user knows what to do without reading instructions.

### 4. Does everything contribute to the decision?

**Check:**
- [ ] Is every element on the screen justified?
- [ ] Are there decorative elements that don't aid comprehension?
- [ ] Is information density appropriate for the context?

**Pass criteria:** Removing any element would reduce the user's ability to make a decision.

---

## Three-Second Rule Levels

| Time | Understanding | Verification |
|------|---------------|--------------|
| **3 seconds** | What does the system do? | Ask 5 new users, 4/5 must answer correctly |
| **10 seconds** | The process from input to decision | Ask 5 new users, 4/5 must describe the flow |
| **60 seconds** | Why the result is useful for business | Ask 5 domain experts, 4/5 must articulate value |

---

## Audit Process

### Step 1: Select Screens

Priority order:
1. Landing page / Dashboard
2. Map view
3. Search results
4. Object detail
5. Report view
6. Settings

### Step 2: Apply Four Questions

For each screen, answer all four questions. Document failures.

### Step 3: Prioritize Fixes

| Severity | Criteria | Action |
|----------|----------|--------|
| Critical | Fails question 1 or 3 | Block release |
| High | Fails question 2 | Fix before next version |
| Medium | Fails question 4 | Fix in next iteration |
| Low | Minor improvements | Backlog |

### Step 4: Verify Fixes

Re-audit after fixes. Same criteria apply.

---

## Example Audit

### Screen: Dashboard

| Question | Result | Notes |
|----------|--------|-------|
| 1. 3-second understanding | ✅ Pass | KPI cards immediately visible |
| 2. Reality → Decision | 🟡 Partial | Map shows reality, but decision basis requires scrolling |
| 3. Obvious action | ✅ Pass | Primary action button prominent |
| 4. Everything contributes | ❌ Fail | News feed does not aid decision-making |

**Action:** Remove news feed or move to secondary panel.

---

## Core Principle Check for RFCs

Before an RFC is approved, it must answer:

| Question | Answer Location |
|----------|----------------|
| How does this component support "Reality → Decision"? | Cognitive Purpose section |
| Can it be understood in 3 seconds? | User Expectation section |
| What decision does it help the user make? | Cognitive Purpose section |
| How does it reduce cognitive load? | Interaction Contract section |

---

## ÄNDRINGSHISTORIA

| Version | Datum | Beskrivning |
|---------|-------|-------------|
| 1.0 | 2026-07-02 | Initial experience audit checklist |

---

## STATUS

**LOCKED**

- Mindre revideringar: 1.x-serien
- Brytande ändringar: Kräver Architecture Review, ny major-version (2.0+)